Linux Terminal Speed Performance Comparison

gnome-terminal, konsole, wterm, rxvt and Eterm – Linux has a number of well developed and mature terminal applications, but according to a blogger nobody has performed a decent comparison of their text display performance.

With this motivation the guy did some performance tests and was able to conclude that both “gnome-terminal and konsole are exceptionally fast” by taking only only 0.25 to 0.59 seconds to display a 647976 bytes large file, but hey are both very memory hungry, while the more memory efficient ones; wterm, rxvt and Eterm are less speed efficient. And xterm is just slow :)

Read the blog entry here: Comprehensive Linux Terminal Performance Comparison

Gnome terminal.

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Related posts:

  1. Tomcat Performance: Linux faster than Windows
  2. MySQL Optimization and Performance Tips
  3. Gnome 2.14 feature highlights
  4. Optimize MySQL Performance With MySQLTuner
  5. AMD DDR2 Linux Performance
  6. Linux versus Windows: OS impact on uptime and speed
  7. Rethinking the GUI (Graphical User Interface) and the CLI (Command Line Interface)
  8. Speed Up Google Maps-based Applications With Caching
  9. Top 10 Free Windows 7 Applications
  10. “Bookmark” SSH-Connections using SSHMenu for GNOME

Popular Related Items »

2 Comments »

  1. Joenson said,

    September 7, 2007 @ 15:27

    Great comparison :)

    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Claus said,

    February 21, 2008 @ 21:05

    Today I wrote a post on terminal project trying to combine the traditional command line interface with elements from the traditional graphical user interface.

    Rethinking the GUI (Graphical User Interface) and the CLI (Command Line Interface)

    http://mediakey.dk/~cc/rethinking-the-gui-graphical-user-interface-and-the-cli-command-line-interface/

    UA:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    UA:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment